The Philosophical and Intellectual Heritage during Medieval Period: A Study of Ibn Rushd

Dr. Ashaq Hussain

Abstract


Philosophy connotes the search for knowledge and understanding of the nature and meaning of the universe and of human life. Reflection on cosmic processes and on the mystery of human existence is as old as man himself. Therefore, Philosophy may be regarded as the oldest discipline. All civilization possesses a rich collection of observations on cosmology and on human nature, which is reflected in their world-view, folklore, legends and mythology. Muslim Scholars made an outstanding contribution to the history of ideas as well as to the description and classification of the various disciplines. Islamic epistemology has an astonishingly open and dynamic character. Inspired by this epistemology, Muslims embarked on the pursuit of knowledge with a fervor and intensity which has not been witnessed either before or after. They explored the treasure-houses of knowledge in the East and the West, and imbibed the wisdom of the ancients. They carefully sifted and evaluated the intellectual heritage of other civilizations within the ideational and moral framework of Islam. What emerged out of this process was a creative synthesis which bore the unmistakable imprint of the Islamic ethos. The story of the quest for philosophy in the annals of Islamic civilization conforms to this patter. Abu al-Walid Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Rushd, better known in the Latin West as Averroes, lived during a unique period in Western intellectual history, in which interest in philosophy and theology was waning in the Muslim world and just beginning to flourish in Latin Christendom. Just fifteen years before his birth, the great critic of Islamic philosophy, al-Ghazzali (1058-1111), had died after striking a blow against Muslim Neoplatonic philosophy, particularly against the work of the philosopher Ibn Sina (Avicenna). From such bleak circumstances emerged the Spanish-Muslim philosophers, of which the jurist and physician Ibn Rushd came to be regarded as the final and most influential Muslim philosopher, especially to those who inherited the tradition of Muslim philosophy in the West. This paper provides an overview of Ibn Rushd’s contribution to philosophy, emphasizing his commentaries, his educational philosophy with special reference to Averroism school of thought and his lasting influence on medieval thought and the Western philosophical tradition.


Keywords


Philosophy, Ibn Rushd, Medieval Period, Averroism, Epistemology

Full Text:

PDF

References


a. Primary Sources

Rushd Ibn, with Commentary by Moses Narboni, The Epistle on the Possibility of Conjunction with the Active Intellect. K. Bland (trans.). (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1982).

Rushd Ibn, Decisive Treatise & Epistle Dedicatory. C. Butterworth (trans.). (Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 2001).

Rushd Ibn, Faith and Reason in Islam [al-Kashf]. I. Najjar (trans.). (Oxford: Oneworld, 2001).

Rushd Ibn, Long Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima. A. Hyman (trans.), Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Hackett, 1973).

Rushd Ibn, Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. C. Butterworth (trans.). (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998).

Ibn Rushd, Tahafut al-Tahafut. S. Van Den Bergh (trans.). (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954).

Rushd Ibn, Treatise Concerning the Substance of the Celestial Sphere. A. Hyman (trans.), Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Hackett, 1973).

b. Secondary Sources

Benmakhlour. A, Ibn Rushd (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2000)

Black. D, “Ibn Rushd, the Incoherence of the Incoherence.” The Classics of Western Philosophy: a Reader’s Guide. Eds. Jorge Gracia, Gregory Reichberg and Bernard Schumacher (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003).

Black. D, “Consciousness and Self-Knowledge in Aquinas’s Critique of Ibn Rushd’s Psychology.”Journal of the History of Philosophy 31.3 (July 1993): 23-59.

Black. D, “Memory, Time and Individuals in Ibn Rushd’s Psychology.” Medieval Theology and Philosophy 5 (1996): 161-187

Davidson.H, Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Ibn Rushd, on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect and Theories of Human Intellect (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).

Genequand.C, “Metaphysics.” History of Islamic Philosophy. S. Nasr and O. Leaman (eds.). (New York: Routledge, 2001).

Hughes. A, The Texture of the Divine: Imagination in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Thought (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003).

Fakhry. M, A History of Islamic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).

Fakhry. M, Ibn Rushd (Ibn Rushd) (Oxford: Oneworld, 2001).

Fakhry.M, Islamic Occasionalism: and its Critique by Ibn Rushd and Aquinas (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1958).

Lapidus. I, A History of Islamic Societies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Leaman.O, Ibn Rushd and His Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).

Leaman.O, An Introduction to Classical Islamic Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

Leaman.O, “Ibn Rushd” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Vol. 4. E. Craig (gen. ed.) (London: Routledge, 1998).

Mohammed.O, Ibn Rushd’s Doctrine of Immortality: a Matter of Controversy (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Press, 1984).

Urvoy.D, “Ibn Rushd.” History of Islamic Philosophy. S. Nasr and O. Leaman (eds.). (New York: Routledge, 2001).

Urvoy.D, Ibn Rushd (Ibn Rushd) (London: Routledge, 1991).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.